In
hopes of combating the growing scourge of antibiotic-resistant
bacteria, in particular drug-resistant staph bacteria,
a team of scientists from the Scripps Research Institute
has designed a new type of vaccine that could one
day be used in humans to block the onset of infection.
The advantage of the new vaccine is that it would
work not only on current bacterial resistant stains
but also would not induce the potential for new bacterial
resistance because, rather than killing bacterial
cells, it blocks their communication system, preventing
the shift from harmless to virulent, thus allowing
the body's natural defenses to combat the bacteria.
The work was published in the October 29 issue of
the journal Chemistry and Biology.
Staph and other infections are becoming increasingly
deadly because many strains of the bacteria that
cause disease develop resistance to the array of
antibiotics used to control them. A Centers for Disease
Control (CDC) report released last week estimated
that more than 94,000 Americans were infected in
1995 by a drug-resistant staph "superbug" called
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA),
and more than 18,000 Americans died that year during
hospital stays involving this type of infection.
The bacterial infection process is dependent on
a sort of chemical conversation between individual
bacterial cells, referred to as quorum sensing. In
their free-living state, bacteria are typically easy
to kill and non-virulent. The shift to virulence
is dependent on small molecules emitted by bacteria
known as autoinducers, because bacteria sense when
concentrations of these autoinducers are high enough
to suggest a large number of other bacteria are present.
"Bacteria basically sense they have enough
of their buddies around to allow them to say, 'OK,
we're in a favorable environment to start turning
on certain genes,'" says team leader Professor
Kim Janda, director of the Worm Institute for Research
and Medicine at Scripps Research and a vaccine expert
who has worked on the development of vaccines for
obesity and drugs of addiction, among other problems.
The genes turned on by quorum sensing may encode
proteins harmless to their hosts, but they can also
code for the toxins and other products arising from
bacterial infections that cause disease. Sequestering
autoinducers in some way could therefore block quorum
sensing and, hence, the establishment of infections.
The scientists predict that such a strategy would
not lead to resistance in bacteria because it wouldn't
kill the cells. Bacteria would simply remain in an
inert form because they would be tricked into "thinking" not
enough other cells were present to shift into their
virulent mode.
Bacteria use a variety of genetic mechanisms in
quorum sensing. The Scripps Research team focused
on Gram-positive bacteria, whose quorum sensing is
controlled by four basic types of autoinducers tied
to a circuit known as the accessory gene regulator.
Based on the known structure of one of these autoinducers,
the team designed a molecule known as a hapten that,
when conjugated with specific proteins using well-established
procedures, induces the production of antibodies
by the immune system.
The Janda group intentionally designed the hapten
to be stable enough to work well as a potential treatment,
and ultimately chose to pursue work with one of the
haptens that proved the most stable. Past research
by other groups has involved successfully blocking
quorum sensing using molecules that essentially plug
the keyholes on cell surfaces that allow bacteria
to sense autoinducers, but such strategies have been
hampered by the inherent instabilities of the molecules
involved.
Next, the team isolated and studied the antibodies
produced in mice injected with the hapten, called
AP4. Subsequent experiments revealed that one of
these antibodies in particular, when administered
to mice infected with Staphylococcus aureus, was
highly effective at binding with and sequestering
the targeted autoinducer, and to a lesser extent
with a second autoinducer. This activity proved to
effectively block quorum sensing and infection in
the mice.
Resistance to S. aureus, a common form of Staph
infection has become a major concern in hospitals,
and, as the recent CDC report indicates, outside
of medical settings as well. As a result, says Janda, "I
think the impact of this approach could be really
huge, because our approach side steps the resistance
problem with common antibiotic treatments."
Janda says the antibody AP4-24H11 could one day
be given to humans as a passive vaccine to block
infections as it did in mice. The AP4 hapten could
also be applied as an active vaccine that would induce
production of antibodies to block quorum sensing.
He says such vaccines could, for instance, be given
to patients entering the hospital for surgery to
prevent infection by Staph bacteria. This would not,
however, probably be an effective treatment against
infections that have already progressed, because
in such cases the damage from quorum sensing would
already have been done.
Janda and his colleagues, including Junguk Park,
Gunnar Kaufmann and Richard Ulevitch, chairman of
the Scripps Research Department of Immunology, are
already working to design related haptens that will
induce antibodies effective against all the autoinducers
used by Gram-positive bacteria, which might one day
be administered as a vaccine cocktail to prevent
infection by a wide range of bacteria. The group
is seeking a pharmaceutical partner to fund further
tests with AP4 and AP4-24H11 in animal models and,
if all goes well, to carry a vaccine through human
clinical trials.
Scripps Research Institute
|